What happens when you burn food?

Posted by: Barthélemy Barbancourt

Tagged in: Untagged 

The world's grain stocks have dropped from four to 2.6 months cover since 2000, despite two bumper harvests in North America. China's inventories are at a 30-year low. Asian rice stocks are near danger level.
Barack Obama has not reversed the Bush policy on biofuels, despite food riots in a string of poor countries last year and calls for a moratorium. The subsidy of 45 cents per gallon remains.
The world population is adding "another Britain" every year. This will continue until mid-century. By then we will have an extra 2.4bn mouths to feed.

China and Southeast Asia are switching to animal-protein diets as they grow wealthy, as the Koreans did before them. It takes roughly 3-5kgs of animal feed from grains to produce 1kg of meat.

A report by Standard Chartered, The End of Cheap Food, said North Africa and the Middle East have already hit the buffers. The region imports 71pc of its rice and 58pc of its corn. It lacks water to boost output. The population is growing fast. It will have to import, and cross fingers.

The UN says global farm yields must rise 77pc, which means redoubling Norman Borlaug's "green revolution". It will not be easy. China's trend growth in crops yields has slipped from 3.1pc a year in the early 1960s to 0.9pc over the last decade

Since 2000, China has lost nearly 1,400 square miles each year to desert. Urban sprawl is paving over fertile land in the East. Water supply from Himalayan glaciers is ebbing. The Yellow River has been reduced to "an agonising tickle". It no longer reaches the sea for 200 days a year.

Farmers are draining the aquifers. Environmentalist Ma Jun says in China's Water Crisis that they are drilling as deep as 1,000 metres into non-replenishable reserves. The grain region of the Hai River Basin relies on groundwater for 70pc of irrigation.
Ethanol Kills. Using oil is by far the more humane thing to burn. The world will really hate us when they find that they are starving so that a few enviro-weenies can feel good about themselves.

Trackback(0)
Comments (8)add comment
TomC
$$$
written by TomC , October 26, 2009

How much of our extorted money would be saved if the government would stop trying to thwart capitalism by disabling ideas that work or subsidizing ideas that would either develop naturally themselves or, if they are bad ideas, never happen.

Whether ethanol when vast reserves of oil and gas are available, home ownership for those who cannot afford it, green cars for those who do not want to buy them, money for government schools for declining populations that do not need them, or any of ten-thousand other government dis/incentives.

Just get the hell out of the way and let capitalism do its thing!



Ed Salden
...
written by Ed Salden , October 26, 2009

I think we're headed for a period of increasing imbalance worldwide.

Two tides will collide and the resulting storm could be the end for most of us.

I'm talking about the scarcification of food and fuel. Every ten years the world consumes as much oil as it has in all of accumulated history. That's what you get with a seven percent annual increase worldwide.

How long can that go on?

Same thing, more or less, with food and population.

Food and fuel are going up in price and not going down again, not until we don't need them anymore, which would only be after a big reduction in world population.



Barthélemy Barbancourt
Artificially created scarcity,
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , October 26, 2009

Ed, you may be right but you also need to be honest about what is creating this storm.

Obama and the Enviro-weenies have banned drilling for oil in the USA. We have had a 30 year ban on nuclear power, which wuld relieve pressure on oil and natural gas usuage.

On the food front, our government poays people to burn food. If you take away the subsidied, ethanol production would stop tomorrow.

Finally, populations stablize as they advance economically. A plan to move more of the world towards capitalism would reduce population growth. The billions wasted on assinine Global Warming schemes could have gone towards advancing society.

In short, liberals fucking with natural markets and anti-progress enviro-weenies are the architects of this crisis. If you want to avoid it, start by closing the EPA and the Sierra Club.



Ed Salden
...
written by Ed Salden , October 26, 2009

Jimmy Carter said it and they're still making fun of him for it.

Every ten years we consume as much oil as in all of accumulated history. Even if the most optimistic reserves estimates are right we're gonna run out pretty soon, and no other means, even nuclear can be as cheap as just pumping the stuff right out of the ground.

So energy will get pricier, alot pricier, during our lives, no matter what.

I don't think there's a long future for corn ethinol as fuel, except as psychic fuel in the form of whiskey.




0
...
written by notpcenuff4u , October 26, 2009

Pretty soon?
I guess that depends on your definition.
Some say it's most likely 140 years but that doesn't include shale oil.
Price will go up and down accordingly and would drop like a rock if we started drilling our own and started new plant construction in nukes.



Barthélemy Barbancourt
I'm betting we'll have plenty of oil for the rest of Ed's life
written by Barthélemy Barbancourt , October 26, 2009

And mine. We'll need to get a President and Congress that allows America to tap our own natural resources, but $5 a gallon gas should be all that takes. Americans hate high gas prices as they effect them directly.

Don't forget coal. The US is the Saudi Arabia of coal. China is building a plant a week so they project a long supply.

At this point, any energy crisis will be created by politics, not nature.

Oh and not to nitpick, but this statement is impossible "Every ten years we consume as much oil as in all of accumulated history"



Kermit
...
written by Kermit , October 26, 2009

Every ten years we consume as much oil as in all of accumulated history.
Pretty funny considering petroleum as a commodity is little more than 100 years old. But keep up the negativity of liberalism, Ed. It's all liberals have to work with.



Sequel
Ed
written by Sequel , October 26, 2009

After the considerable expense of building a nuke plant, the power is essentially free. Oh sure there's some overhead, but it just burns and burns, and spins those generators.

If you don't want to live in a cave and kill off most of your fellow man, then the nuke plant is the ONLY alternative.
As you point out eventually we will run out of hydrocarbons to burn.
I think it will take a hell of a lot longer that the green asshats say it will, but sure, at some point in the future we run out of gas.




Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy